Tori Spelling said this week that throughout her career, tabloids and fans have made "horrific" claims that she’s had plastic surgery she didn’t get done.

"Since I was 17, since before there was internet, wow, there was the Enquirer, The Globe, it was like the tabloid paper magazines," the 52-year-old told Dr. Terry Dubrow while they were discussing plastic surgery on her "MisSpelling" podcast on Monday.  

"And the Globe came out with something when I was 17," she said. "I had started ‘90210’ and gotten famous. And they were like, ‘She’s had all this plastic surgery.’ So, they did something like that to a 17-year-old."

Spelling said the Globe claimed she had gotten a new chin and cheek implants, but all she had actually gotten was a nose job.

ROSE MCGOWAN SAYS 'CHARMED' EXECS WOULD SCRUTINIZE HER WEIGHT BETWEEN SEASONS

She remembered her dad, producer Aaron Spelling, told her not to worry about the story, saying the tabloids would move on to another celebrity next week, but she said it’s stung her whole life.

"At 17, it crushed my whole soul," she said. "I never unsaw that. I never unheard it. I was like a 17-year-old girl that was like 'OK, am I pretty? I’m trying to find myself in this world, but I’m on TV.' I was in high school for real."

In the age of social media, Spelling admitted it still hurts her feelings when people speculate about her.

'MORMON WIVES' STAR SAYS PLASTIC SURGERY NIGHTMARE RUINED HER LIFE AND REALITY TV CAREER

"It’s horrific. I’m 52, I’ll be 53 in May, and I purposefully go the other way because everyone says — every photo I put up, people say, ‘Stop with the filler!’ I’m like, 'I’m not!'" she said. "I don’t know — I guess at this point, I should be like f--- it and have my whole face done because they already say I’ve had it done. So, it’s like I can’t win, but I don’t know why that keeps me from doing stuff."

Spelling said she usually doesn’t respond when people make untrue comments, but can’t always help herself.

"I find myself sometimes, though, being like, ‘No! it’s not true! Have I had filler in the past? Yes — I don’t have filler right now. I have Botox,' and like telling them what I have. Like why am I — it’s like I’m scared to like — like, ‘No, I haven’t had all that done.’"

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR THE ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTER

Spelling has previously detailed her experience getting breast implants at a strip mall after a recommendation from a friend who was a stripper.

"I was 19, so I was like, ‘This isn’t Beverly Hills, what’s happening?’ I was confused. I was best friends with Alicia Silverstone and Carmen Electra, and they were taking care of me [after the surgery]. I can’t even make this stuff up."

LIKE WHAT YOU’RE READING? CLICK HERE FOR MORE ENTERTAINMENT NEWS

She added, "He was a fine doctor, it was just like an outpatient center in a strip mall."

She described her natural breasts as an A plus to a B-cup, adding that she had "just wanted to make them fuller."

Spelling said she had just gotten them done again, joking, "Third time will be the charm."

"I think my body doesn’t like to take foreign things," she explained. "I think they’re OK now. My whole intention of getting them redone was to go smaller ‘cause, like looking back to the ‘90s, I was like, 'I liked my boobs. I wish I had just kept them. They’re really great.'"

Comedian Bill Maher pressed Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro on Friday over his opposition to U.S. involvement in Iran, challenging the Democrat on what he would do if he were commander-in-chief and had been given knowledge that Iran would soon have nuclear weapons.

"Our chief negotiator said they were talking to Iran up until the war started. He said their opening salvo at the negotiations, ‘We’re a couple of weeks away from having 11 bombs.’" Maher said during the latest installment of "Real Time." 

"If you were the president, and you got that information, you would still do nothing?" 

Shapiro quickly rejected the notion.

TRUMP SUDDENLY SEEMS ANXIOUS TO END THE WAR AS AMERICAN CASUALTIES MOUNT AND IRAN FINDS WAYS TO HIT BACK

"No. What I would do, and what the President of the United States failed to do, was be clear with the American people about what the hell we were doing here," he said.

"Was the plan to go after the nuclear weapons? The weapons, by the way, he said were destroyed… seven months ago. Was the plan to go and do regime change? In which case, who the hell is going to take over? I don't think the son [Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei] is any better than the father. Was the plan to go in there later, but you got forced because Netanyahu forced your hand?" 

"I think if you don't have clarity about why you're going in, you have no way of knowing how the hell to get out," he added, his remarks met with applause.

PENTAGON POLICY CHIEF GRILLED AS DEM CLAIMS TRUMP BROKE PROMISE ABOUT GOING TO WAR WITH IRAN

Maher also pushed back on the Pennsylvania Democrat's suggestion that the rationale for the war remains unclear.

"We've lost 13 American soldiers in a war that the American people and, by the way, most of the global community, has no idea why the hell we went there in the first place," Shapiro said.

"I think people have an idea," Maher countered.

FETTERMAN CONDEMNS DEMOCRATS FOR REFUSING TO PUT 'COUNTRY OVER PARTY' ON IRAN STRIKES

"What was the reason we went in?" Shapiro asked.

"Everything you said – the nukes, regime change, and just to reshuffle the deck in the Middle East. Nothing ever really was going to get better until that regime went away," Maher replied, prompting chuckles from the audience.

Maher then added, "But we'll see what happens."

Shapiro noted that he was morally opposed to the Iranian regime's actions that placed Americans in harm's way, stating that he never viewed the late Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as a "good person" and that he is "not shedding a tear" for regime members who were killed.  

"[The ayatollah] chanted, for five decades, ‘Death to America.’" These are people who blew up and killed Americans. These are not good people…" he said. 

"What I am saying, though, is, if you are the commander-in-chief, you have a responsibility to the people you send into harm's way, a responsibility to the American people to explain why it is you're doing what you're doing and how the hell you get out of it once the mission is accomplished…

"The president has yet to look the American people in the eye and explain that, and that is a failure of leadership," he added.

Fox News Digital reached out to the White House for comment on Shapiro's statements but did not immediately hear back. 

Senate Republicans are gearing up for a floor battle over Trump-backed voter ID legislation, but another GOP senator plans to oppose it.

Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., won’t support the Safeguarding American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) America Act, a decision that could throw a wrench into the GOP’s plan to force Senate Democrats into tough vote after tough vote next week.

"I'm a no," Tillis said. "I'm going to do everything I can to prevent it from even moving forward."

SENATE GOP EYES BLAME GAME AS TRUMP-BACKED SAVE ACT HEADS FOR DEFEAT

He did offer an alternative, arguing that if Republicans were "serious" about voter ID, they’d consider legislation that incentivized states to use the practice in exchange for federal funding. If not, the money would go toward ensuring "election integrity" oversight.

"Who could be against that? You know, and then rock on, California, if you want to enable ballot harvesting," Tillis said. "Make sure you do it on your nickels, because we're going to spend the money to oversee the elections to make sure you did it legally."

His resistance to the bill comes after President Donald Trump demanded that Republicans ram the bill through Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and Senate Democrats’ blockade with a talking filibuster.

TRUMP, THUNE CLASH ON VOTER ID ULTIMATUM AS GOP REMAINS DIVIDED ON PATH FORWARD

Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., and Republicans landed on a plan to put the bill on the floor that doesn’t take the route of a talking filibuster, given that there isn’t enough unity among Republicans to block Democrats’ amendments that could drastically change the bill.

However, that process is in the spirit of the talking filibuster and will allow Republicans to load up amendments on the floor for a marathon debate session. Still, it won’t lower the threshold to pass the bill with just a simple majority, something the talking filibuster would have done.

Republicans know it’s destined to fail and are trying to shift blame to Schumer and Democrats with their floor strategy.

THUNE GUARANTEES VOTER ID BILL TO HIT THE SENATE DESPITE SCHUMER, DEM OPPOSITION: 'WE WILL HAVE A VOTE'

But Tillis, who was a co-sponsor of the bill’s predecessor called the SAVE Act, disagreed with the changes Trump proposed to the legislation, which included banning mail-in ballots with limited exceptions, halting men in women’s sports and stopping transgender surgeries for minors.

"You know, taking the language from the White House without understanding the state-by-state implications, politically and procedurally, just doesn't sound like we're letting the people at the tip of the spear — that's these people running for re-election — define what we should be voting on next week," Tillis said.

Tillis joins Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, in opposing the bill. Their defection, coupled with Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., announcing on CBS’ "The Takeout with Major Garrett" that he wouldn’t support the legislation in its "current state" over Trump’s criticism of mail-in balloting, gives the GOP a razor-thin margin of error in trying to even open debate on the bill.

William Shatner was slated to undergo surgery Wednesday after injuring a shoulder late last year. 

During an appearance at the Academy of Science Fiction, Fantasy and Horror Films’ 53rd annual Saturn Awards in Burbank, California, Sunday, Shatner, 94, revealed he recently fell off his horse during a ride. 

"I ride the horses that can compete in equine skills, which is fast down and ends on a sliding stop," he said. "And the horse that I owned, I came off.

"And she had a habit of going too far, like six inches to the side," he added. "And I’m riding it. And I’m ready. And she goes [too fast and sent him flying]. I’m not a young stuntman anymore. I started to roll but hit the dirt with my shoulder. So, I wrecked my shoulder."

WILLIAM SHATNER SHARES HIS BIGGEST REGRET FROM HOLLYWOOD CAREER: ‘I FAILED HORRIBLY’

Shatner told the crowd he was scheduled to undergo a "new type of shoulder operation called a reverse something or other" March 11.

"You put the ball in the socket and the socket in the thing, and you come out 10 hours later, and you’re pain-free," he said in an attempt to describe the surgery. "So, that’s what I am meandering towards."

A representative for Shatner did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.

Last year, Shatner got candid about a "difficult" health condition he's battled since the '90s. 

LIKE WHAT YOU’RE READING? CLICK HERE FOR MORE ENTERTAINMENT NEWS

In a promotional video for the nonprofit Tinnitus Quest, the "Star Trek" star, 94, opened up about the challenges he's faced while living with tinnitus for decades. 

"My own journey with tinnitus started when I was filming a ‘Star Trek’ episode called 'Arena,' and I was too close to the special effects' explosion. And the result was that I was left with permanent tinnitus," Shatner said in the video.

"And, over the years, I’ve had many ups and downs with my tinnitus, and I know from firsthand experience just how difficult it can get."

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR THE ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTER

Tinnitus is a condition in which a person can experience ringing or other noises in one or both ears, according to the Mayo Clinic. Tinnitus is a common problem and can affect about 15% to 20% of people, and is especially common in older adults.

Shatner, who was diagnosed with tinnitus in the 1990s, shared that while "there are no effective treatments" for the condition, he remains focused on trying to raise money for a cure. 

In 2024, the legendary actor shared the secret to remaining youthful in his 90s. 

"Just staying engaged in life, to stay curious. But the luck has a lot to do with it in your health," he told People at the time.

"Your life's energy, the soul energy of your body is a product of health," he added. "If you're sick, you can't be energetic. You're dying. So my luck has been, I've been healthy all my life."

A federal appeals court on Wednesday granted the Trump administration's request to pause a lower court order that blocked it from deporting illegal immigrants to so-called "third countries" — granting a near-term reprieve to the administration just hours before the lower court's order was slated to take effect.

Trump administration lawyers had appealed the ruling to the First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals last week, arguing that the order from U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy created an "unworkable scheme" that threatened to derail sensitive negotiations with outside countries, and risked derailing up to "thousands" of planned deportations. 

They also argued Murphy's ruling cut against two previous Supreme Court emergency stays last year, after the high court intervened and allowed the administration to continue its deportation policy, for now. 

US JUDGE ACCUSES TRUMP ADMIN OF ‘MANUFACTURING CHAOS’ IN SOUTH SUDAN DEPORTATIONS, ESCALATING FEUD

The case is all but certain to be punted to the high court for a full review on its merits, as senior Trump administration officials acknowledged earlier this year.

Murphy, a Biden appointee, sided with migrants last month in his 81-page ruling, determining that the Department of Homeland Security's third-country removal process — or the process by which migrants are removed from the U.S. to a country other than their country of origin — is unlawful and violates due process protections under the U.S. Constitution.

He ruled that the Trump administration must first try to deport the migrants to their home country, or to a country of removal previously designated by an immigration judge. Only after that process, he said, could migrants be removed to a third country, so long as "meaningful notice" is provided, as well as the opportunity for the migrants to raise any fear of persecution in the third country identified for their removal under a so-called "reasonable fear" interview.

The third-country removal policy "fails to satisfy due process for a raft of reasons, not least of which is that nobody really knows anything about these purported ‘assurances,’" Murphy wrote in his ruling, though he stayed it from taking force for 15 days in order to give the administration time to appeal.

Barring intervention from the U.S. appeals court, the order was slated to take force on Thursday. 

FEDERAL JUDGES IN NEW YORK AND TEXAS BLOCK TRUMP DEPORTATIONS AFTER SCOTUS RULING

DHS officials have previously claimed an "undisputed authority" to deport criminal illegal migrants to third countries that have agreed to accept them. 

"If these activist judges had their way, aliens who are so uniquely barbaric that their own countries won’t take them back, including convicted murderers, child rapists and drug traffickers, would walk free on American streets," former Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in June, after the Supreme Court temporarily permitted the Trump administration to continue its deportation policy amid legal challenges. 

Murphy had presided for months over a class-action lawsuit filed by migrants challenging deportations to third countries, including South Sudan, El Salvador, and both Costa Rica and Guatemala, which the Trump administration has reportedly eyed in its ongoing wave of deportations.

He has sparred with the Trump administration while overseeing the case, including in May, when he accused the administration of failing to comply with a court order requiring it to keep in U.S. custody six migrants who were deported to South Sudan without due process or notice.

'WOEFULLY INSUFFICIENT': US JUDGE REAMS TRUMP ADMIN FOR DAYS-LATE DEPORTATION INFO

Murphy previously ordered that the migrants remain in U.S. custody at a military base in Djibouti until each of them could be given a "reasonable fear interview," or a chance to explain to U.S. officials any fear of persecution or torture, should they be released into South Sudanese custody.  

Murphy previously acknowledged the criminal histories in question after Trump officials blasted the individuals removed as the "worst of the worst."

"The court recognizes that the class members at issue here have criminal histories," Murphy wrote in an order last year.

"But that does not change due process," he wrote. "The court treats its obligation to these principles with the seriousness that anyone committed to the rule of law should understand."

Senate Democrats are preparing a series of war powers votes aimed at curbing President Donald Trump's authority to continue military operations against Iran — and forcing the administration to publicly defend its actions.

Several Senate Democrats filed war powers resolutions last week meant to handcuff Trump and his continued conflict in the Middle East. It’s a power play by the group, who say the administration has not shown enough evidence that the U.S. should have struck Iran in the first place, much less continue fighting in the region.

Sens. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., Cory Booker, D-N.J., Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., collectively filed five war powers resolutions last week, and they’re joined by Sens. Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., and Tim Kaine, D-Va. Kaine has filed resolution after resolution to curb Trump’s war authority since he took office for his second term.

SCHUMER ONCE BLOCKED TRUMP'S MOVE TO FILL THE NATION'S OIL RESERVES, NOW HE WANTS THEM OPENED

Those resolutions, barring an official slate of hearings with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, could hit the Senate next week and grind down floor time.

"This Congress should be focused on the biggest military action since the Afghanistan war, and we're not even holding hearings on that," Booker told Fox News Digital. 

Murphy said that the resolutions could hit the Senate floor as soon as next week, and warned that if hearings are set in motion, Democrats would be able to "call up a vote every day on war powers and force at least a short debate and vote every day."

"There's no excuse to hide what the administration is doing from the public," Murphy said. 

STATE DEPARTMENT DEFENDS 'PROACTIVE' EVACUATION EFFORTS AGAINST DEMS' CLAIMS OF DIPLOMATIC CHAOS

While the group wouldn’t reveal exactly what their gridlock-inducing floor strategy would look like, they contended that the chairs of the Senate Armed Services and Senate Foreign Relations committees had already requested that Rubio and Hegseth testify.

Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chair Jim Risch, R-Idaho, wouldn’t say whether he had requested Rubio to appear before his panel but blamed Senate Democrats for helping the Iranian Revolutionary Guard.

"You'll notice the Democrats are the only entity on this planet who are helping the IRGC," Risch told Fox News Digital, referring to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

OPERATION EPIC FURY SURVIVES SENATE CHALLENGE AS REPUBLICANS CLOSE RANKS BEHIND TRUMP

The group argued that Rubio and Hegseth should make the case for the war in Iran to the public and that closed-door, classified briefings on the matter weren’t enough to convince them that the war was necessary.

"I was absolutely not convinced. In fact, nothing was offered to show me that we were under imminent attack," Baldwin said. "That we were under imminent attack, or that it was reasonable to believe that we were at risk — and that's what would trigger the president's authority to use military force without coming to Congress first."

Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., acknowledged that Democrats’ strategy would eat away at floor time but cautioned that "we’ll see how the next few days in the conflict go."

"I'm sure there'll be some decisions made around that, but maybe that'll affect whether or not they try to trigger all those," Thune said.

Thune said that "there always are" hearings and noted that the Senate Armed Services Committee would be holding hearings soon on the annual National Defense Authorization Act.

"So they're going to have all those folks coming through on a fairly routine basis anyway, and I'm sure this will be a subject of discussion," Thune said.

Emilia Van Der Beek, 9, reflected on navigating grief after the death of her father.

James Van Der Beek died Feb. 11 after a courageous battle with stage 3 colorectal cancer. He was 48.

To honor what would have been his 49th birthday, Kimberly Van Der Beek shared a video their daughter recorded to post on social media. 

"As you all know probably now, my dad has passed away, but I'm just going to tell you little tips, or anything that helps you getting through anybody you love who's passing," the little one began.

JAMES VAN DER BEEK RENEWED WEDDING VOWS WITH WIFE IN BEDROOM CEREMONY DAYS BEFORE DEATH

"So today is my dad's birthday, and the No. 1 thing for somebody's passing is to talk to them and let your emotions out. If you miss them, you can cry, you can talk to them. I talk to my dad every day and I start with a sentence and I say, ‘Hi dad, I miss you and I love you so much, and I’ll never stop loving you.'"

JAMES VAN DER BEEK'S FAMILY RAISES OVER $2M AS HOLLYWOOD STARS DONATE BIG AFTER ACTOR'S DEATH

"And I just tell him about my day, how I'm feeling, and I tell my family how I'm feeling, and I know he can hear me, but I can't hear him. My mom can," she continued. "You just, you have to feel them in your heart, because they're in your heart. They're watching over you. They are a part of your body, and in a good place. I know that my dad's in a good place. He's not in pain anymore. He's in heaven."

APP USERS CLICK HERE TO VIEW POST

Emilia noted that her dad is "above the clouds with God," and told her mother's followers that it was OK to cry.  

"Be sad because you miss them. You can be angry but don't blame yourself. Blaming yourself – it's not a good strategy for someone's passing," she said. "And if somebody also lost their dog, or like, somebody they love, and you did too, and they try to tell you, ‘I know how you feel. I felt worse.' They don’t know how you feel. 

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR THE ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTER

"Everybody has different emotions in their body and they express it in different ways, many, many different ways."

"Something my dad told me was, if this didn't work out the way he wanted it to and the way we wanted it to, for him living, I still have to believe in miracles," Emilia added. "Miracles can still happen just later on in life, and they'll keep coming. But maybe when you want them to come, they might not. But if they do pass, if they do go – just remember, they have some work to do on the other side."

Emilia said she prays to her dad, and knows that "he was a good man." She kept one of his hats because it smelled like the "Dawson's Creek" actor.

"A lot of people loved him, and people prayed for him, and he was loved by many, many hearts and many, many people," she said.

The "Varsity Blues" star publicly shared his stage 3 colorectal cancer diagnosis in November 2024, more than a year before his death. He had first received his diagnosis in August 2023.

LIKE WHAT YOU’RE READING? CLICK HERE FOR MORE ENTERTAINMENT NEWS

Kimberly, 44, revealed last month that she hosted a "simple and beautiful and moving" vow renewal ceremony with Van Der Beek, family and friends over Zoom shortly before his death. 

"We decided two days beforehand and our friends got us new rings, filled our bedroom with flowers and candles and we renewed our vows from bed," she told People magazine.

James and Kimberly, (née Brook), first met while they were both vacationing in Israel in 2009. The couple tied the knot on Aug. 1, 2010, during a small ceremony in Tel Aviv, Israel, at the Kabbalah Centre near Dizengoff Square. 

They share six children together, including daughters Olivia, 15, Annabel, 12, Emilia, 9, and Gwendolyn, 7, and sons Joshua, 13, and Jeremiah, 4.